School of Psychology

Experience Excellence Studying People


Dr Markus Bindemann

Lecturer in Psychology

Research interests

My primary research interest is in Cognitive Psychology. I am particularly interested in various aspects of face and person perception, including the detection of people in natural settings, person memory and eyewitness identification, familiar face recognition, the perception of eye-gaze and emotion from faces and other aspects of social cognition. My work to date has combined a wide range of experimental paradigms with reaction time, EEG and eye movement measures.

Key publications

Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C., Ferguson, H.J., & Burton, A.M. (2010). Face, body and centre of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36, 1477-1485.

Bindemann, M., Avetisyan, M., & Blackwell, K. (2010). Finding needles in haystacks: Identity mismatch frequency and facial identity verification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 378-386.

Bindemann, M. & Burton, A.M. (2009). The role of color in human face detection. Cognitive Science, 33, 114-1156.

Bindemann, M., Burton, A.M., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S.R. (2008). Brain potential correlates of face recognition: Geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. Psychophysiology, 45, 535-544.

Also view these in the Kent Academic Repository
Articles

    Megreya, Ahmed M. and Bindemann, Markus and Havard, Catriona et al. (2012) Identity-lineup location influences target selection: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. ISSN 0882-0783. (in press)

    Abstract

    Eyewitnesses often have to recognize the perpetrators of an observed crime from identity lineups. In the construction of these lineups, a decision must be made concerning where a suspect should be placed, but whether location in a lineup affects the identification of a perpetrator has received little attention. This study explored this problem with a face-matching task, in which observers decided if pairs of faces depict the same person or two different people (Experiment 1), and with a lineup task in which the presence of a target had to be detected in an identity parade of five faces (Experiment 2). In addition, this study also explored if high accuracy is related to a perceptual pop-out effect, whereby the target is detected rapidly among the lineup. In both experiments, observers’ eye movements revealed that location determines the order in which people were viewed, whereby faces on the left side were consistently viewed first. This location effect was reflected also in observers’ responses, so that a foil face on the left side of a lineup display was more likely to be misidentified as the target. However, identification accuracy was not related to a pop-out effect. The implications of these findings are discussed.

    Megreya, Ahmed M. and Bindemann, Markus (2012) Identification accuracy for single- and double-perpetrator crimes: Does accomplice gender matter? British Journal of Psychology. (in press)

    Abstract

    There is an important mismatch between empirical research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the real world of criminal investigation. Most research models single-perpetrator crimes but in the real world most crimes involve multiple perpetrators. This study examined how the number of perpetrators affects eyewitness identification by manipulating the gender of accomplices. Observers viewed a video of a staged crime. The crime was committed by a male or female perpetrator, who was presented alone or with an accomplice of the same or the opposite gender. The observers were then asked to identify the perpetrators from target-present or target-absent line-ups. The results revealed a double-perpetrator disadvantage, which was manifested in reduced identification accuracy on target-present line-ups. Importantly however, the gender of the perpetrator or the accomplice had no effect on this disadvantage. This double-perpetrator disadvantage is attributed to the need to divide attention between two concurrent people, compared to single-culprit crimes, rather than an impairment of visual encoding processes. The implications of these findings are discussed.

    Bindemann, Markus and Brown, Chennelle and Koyas, Tiffany et al. (2012) Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. (in press)

    Abstract

    Eyewitnesses frequently mistake innocent suspects for the culprits of an observed crime, and such misidentifications have caused the wrongful convictions of many innocent people. This study attempted to establish the accuracy of individual eyewitnesses by assessing their ability to process unfamiliar faces. Observers viewed a staged crime and later tried to select the culprit from an identity lineup. This was followed by a face test that provides a laboratory analogue to lineup identifications. We found that this face test could determine the reliability of individual witnesses when a positive eyewitness identification had been made. Importantly, this was possible based on the specific response that a witness had made and without prior knowledge of whether the culprit was actually present in the lineup. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in face processing provide a potential instrument for postdicting eyewitness accuracy and for preventing miscarriages of justice.

    Callan, Mitch J. and Ferguson, Heather J. and Bindemann, Markus (2012) Eye movements to audio-visual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. (in press)

    Abstract

    When confronted with bad things happening to good people, observers often engage reactive strategies, such as victim derogation, to maintain a belief in a just world. Although such reasoning is usually made retrospectively, we investigated the extent to which knowledge of another person’s good or bad behavior can also bias people’s online expectations for subsequent good or bad outcomes. Using a fully-crossed design, participants listened to auditory scenarios that varied in terms of whether the characters engaged in morally good or bad behavior while their eye movements were tracked around concurrent visual scenes depicting good and bad outcomes. We found that the good (bad) behavior of the characters influenced gaze preferences for good (bad) outcomes just prior to the actual outcomes being revealed. These findings suggest that beliefs about a person’s moral worth encourage observers to foresee a preferred deserved outcome as the event unfolds. We include evidence to show that this effect cannot be explained in terms of affective priming or matching strategies.

    Bindemann, Markus and Sandford, Adam and Gillatt, Katie et al. (2012) Recognizing faces seen alone or with others: Why are two heads worse than one? Perception. (in press)

    Abstract

    The ability to identify an unfamiliar target face from an identity lineup declines when it is accompanied by a second face during visual encoding. This two-face disadvantage is still little studied and its basis remains poorly understood. This study investigated several possible explanations for this phenomenon. Experiments 1 and 2 varied the number of potential targets (1 or 2) and the number of faces in a lineup (5 or 10) to explore if this effect arises from the number of identity comparisons that need to be made to detect a target in a lineup. These experiments also explored if this effect arises from an uncertainty concerning which is the to-be-identified target in two-face displays, by cueing the relevant face during encoding. Experiment 3 then examined whether the two-face disadvantage reflects the depth of face encoding or a memory effect. The results show that this effect arises from the additional comparisons that are necessary to compare two potential targets to an identity lineup when memory demands are minimized (Experiment 1), but it reflects a difficulty in remembering several faces when targets and lineups cannot be viewed simultaneously (Experiments 2 and 3). However, in both cases the two-face disadvantage could not be eliminated fully by cueing the target. This hints at a further possible locus for this effect, which might reflect perceptual interference during the initial encoding of the target. The implications of these findings are discussed.

    Ozbek, Muge and Bindemann, Markus (2011) Exploring the time course of face matching: Temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing. Vision Research, 51 (19). pp. 2145-2155. ISSN 0042-6989.

    Abstract

    The identification of unfamiliar faces has been studied extensively with matching tasks, in which observers decide if pairs of photographs depict the same person (identity matches) or different people (mismatches). In experimental studies in this field, performance is usually self-paced under the assumption that this will encourage best-possible accuracy. Here, we examined the temporal characteristics of this task by limiting display times and tracking observers’ eye movements. Observers were required to make match/mismatch decisions to pairs of faces shown for 200, 500, 1000, or 2000 ms, or for an unlimited duration. Peak accuracy was reached within 2000 ms and two fixations to each face. However, intermixing exposure conditions produced a context effect that generally reduced accuracy on identity mismatch trials, even when unlimited viewing of faces was possible. These findings indicate that less than two seconds are required for face matching when exposure times are variable, but temporal constraints should be avoided altogether if accuracy is truly paramount. The implications of these findings are discussed.

    Megreya, Ahmed M. and Bindemann, Markus and Havard, Catriona (2011) Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: Evidence from matching tasks. Acta Psychologica, 137 (1). pp. 83-89. ISSN 0001-6918.

    Abstract

    Research on sex differences in face recognition has reported mixed results, on balance suggesting an advantage for female observers. However, it is not clear whether this advantage is specific to face processing or reflects a more general superiority effect in episodic memory. The current study therefore examined sex differences with a face-matching task that eliminates memory demands. Across two experiments, female but not male observers showed an own-sex advantage on match trials, in which two pictures have to be identified as the same person. This advantage was present for whole faces and when only the internal or external facial features were shown. Female observers were also more accurate in these three conditions on mismatch encounters, in which two photographs have to be identified as different people, but this reflects a more general effect that is present for male and female faces. These findings converge with claims of a female advantage in face recognition and demonstrate that this effect persists when memory demands are eliminated.

    Bindemann, Markus and Sandford, Adam (2011) Me, myself, and I: Different recognition rates for three photo-IDs of the same person. Perception, 40 (5). pp. 625-627. ISSN 0301-0066.

    Abstract

    In all contemporary societies, photo-identity documents are used routinely for person identification, but this process is surprisingly fallible. Here we show that this problem is not limited to the identification of specific photographs of a person, but transcends three identity cards of the same person with different images. These identity cards varied substantially from each other in how well they could be recognised but identification rates were generally poor. We also present a potential solution to this problem by demonstrating that person identification can be improved when several photographs of the same person are made available.

    Bindemann, Markus and Scheepers, Christoph and Ferguson, Heather J. et al. (2010) Face, body and centre of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36 (6). pp. 1477-1485.

    Abstract

    Person detection is an important prerequisite of social interaction, but is not well understood. Following suggestions that people in the visual field can capture a viewer’s attention, this study examines the role of the face and the body for person detection in natural scenes. We observed that viewers tend first to look at the center of a scene, and only then to fixate on a person. When a person’s face was rendered invisible in scenes, bodies were detected as quickly as faces without bodies, indicating that both are equally useful for person detection. Detection was optimized when face and body could be seen, but observers preferentially fixated faces, reinforcing the notion of a prominent role for the face in social perception. These findings have implications for claims of attention capture by faces in that they demonstrate a mediating influence of body cues and general scanning principles in natural scenes.

    Bindemann, Markus (2010) Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research, 50 (23). pp. 2577-2587. ISSN 0042-6989.

    Abstract

    In laboratory studies of visual perception, images of natural scenes are routinely presented on a computer screen. Under these conditions, observers look at the center of scenes first, which might reflect an advan- tageous viewing position for extracting visual information. This study examined an alternative possibil- ity, namely that initial eye movements are drawn towards the center of the screen. Observers searched visual scenes in a person detection task, while the scenes were aligned with the screen center or offset horizontally (Experiment 1). Two central viewing effects were observed, reflecting early visual biases to the scene and the screen center. The scene effect was modified by person content but is not specific to person detection tasks, while the screen bias cannot be explained by the low-level salience of a com- puter display (Experiment 2). These findings support the notion of a central viewing tendency in scene analysis, but also demonstrate a bias to the screen center that forms a potential artifact in visual percep- tion experiments.

    Bindemann, Markus and Avetisyan, Meri and Blackwell, Kristy-Ann (2010) Finding Needles in Haystacks: Identity Mismatch Frequency and Facial Identity Verification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16 (4). pp. 378-386. ISSN 1076-898X.

    Abstract

    Accurate person identification is central to all security, police, and judicial systems. A commonplace method to achieve this is to compare a photo-ID and the face of its purported owner. The critical aspect of this task is to spot cases in which these two instances of a face do not match. Studies of person identification show that these instances often go undetected when mismatches occur regularly in an experiment, but this differs from everyday operations in which identity mismatches are rare. The current study therefore examined whether infrequent identity mismatches are more likely to go undetected by observers. In Experiments 1 and 2, identity mismatches were detected equally under low (2%) and high (50%) mismatch prevalence. This pattern persisted when viewing conditions were optimized for person identification in Experiment 3, by using a card-sorting task in which all face identities could be viewed repeatedly, and also under increased task difficulty, by constraining viewing conditions temporally in Experiment 4. These results imply that the infrequent occurrence of identity mismatches in security settings such as passport control does not impair an observer’s ability to detect these important events.

    Burton, A. Mike and Bindemann, Markus and Langton, Stephen R.H. et al. (2009) Gaze Perception Requires Focused Attention: Evidence From an Interference Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35 (1). pp. 108-118. ISSN 0096-1523.

    Abstract

    The direction of another person’s gaze is difficult to ignore when presented at the center of attention. In 6 experiments, perception of unattended gaze was investigated. Participants made directional (left–right) judgments to gazing-face or pointing-hand targets, which were accompanied by a distractor face or hand. Processing of the distractor was assessed via congruency effects on target response times. Congruency effects were found from the direction of distractor hands but not from the direction of distractor gazes (Experiment 1). This pattern persisted even when distractor sizes were increased to compensate for their peripheral presentation (Experiments 2 and 5). In contrast, congruency effects were exerted by profile heads (Experiments 3 and 4). In Experiment 6, isolated eye region distractors produced no congruency effects, even when they were presented near the target. These results suggest that, unlike other facial information, gaze direction cannot be perceived outside the focus of attention.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike (2009) The Role of Color in Human Face Detection. Cognitive Science, 33 (6). pp. 1144-1156. ISSN 0364-0213.

    Abstract

    Significant advances have been made in understanding human face recognition. However, a fundamental aspect of this process, how faces are located in our visual environment, is poorly understood and little studied. Here we examine the role of color in human face detection. We demonstrate that detection performance declines when color information is removed from faces, regardless of whether the surrounding scene context is rendered in color. Furthermore, faces rendered in unnatural colors are hard to detect, suggesting a role beyond simple segmentation. When faces are presented such that half the surface is colored appropriately, and half unnaturally, performance declines. This suggests that observers are not simply using the presence of skin color ‘‘patches’’ to detect faces. Rather, our data suggest that detection operates via a face template combining diagnostic color and face-shape information. These findings are consistent with color-template approaches used in some computer-based face detection systems.

    Burton, A. Mike and Bindemann, Markus (2009) The role of view in human face detection. Vision Research, 49 (15). pp. 2026-2036. ISSN 0042-6989.

    Abstract

    The ability to detect faces in visual scenes is little understood. Across three experiments we examined whether particular facial views (for example those revealing a pair of eyes) facilitate detection while observers are searching for faces in complex visual scenes. Viewers' performance was equivalent for faces shown in frontal and mid-profile pose, but declined in profile (Experiment 1). These differences persisted when only half the face was shown, so that one eye was visible in frontal and profile view but both eyes were preserved in mid-frontal faces (Experiment 2). The same pattern was found when only the upper region of a face appeared in visual scenes, but the presentation of lower half faces eliminated all differences (Experiment 3). These findings demonstrate that the upper face mediates detection across different views, but 'a pair of eyes' cannot explain differences in detectability.

    Bindemann, Markus and Scheepers, Christoph and Burton, A. Mike (2009) Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9 (2:7). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1534-7362.

    Abstract

    In everyday life, human faces are encountered in many different views. Despite this fact, most psychological research has focused on the perception of frontal faces. To address this shortcoming, the current study investigated how different face views are processed, by measuring eye movements to frontal, mid-profile and profile faces during a gender categorization (Experiment 1) and a free-viewing task (Experiment 2). In both experiments observers initially fixated the geometric center of a face, independent of face view. This center-of-gravity effect induced a qualitative shift in the features that were sampled across different face views in the time period immediately after stimulus onset. Subsequent eye fixations focused increasingly on specific facial features. At this stage, the eye regions were targeted predominantly in all face views, and to a lesser extent also the nose and the mouth. These findings show that initial saccades to faces are driven by general stimulus properties, before eye movements are redirected to the specific facial features in which observers take an interest. These findings are illustrated in detail by plotting the distribution of fixations, first fixations, and percentage fixations across time.

    Megreya, Ahmed M. and Bindemann, Markus (2009) Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: The headscarf effect. Perception, 38 (12). pp. 1831-1848. ISSN 0301-0066.

    Abstract

    Five experiments are reported in which the relative importance of internal and external features for unfamiliar face identification are examined by a matching task. In experiments 1-3, Egyptian adults showed a robust internal-feature advantage for matching photographs of Egyptian faces. In experiment 4, a cross-cultural comparison between the ability of Egyptian and British adults to match the internal and external features of unfamiliar Egyptian and British faces was made. Once again, Egyptians showed an internal-feature advantage, for all faces. In contrast, British observers and also Egyptian children in experiment 5 showed external-feature advantages consistent with previous research. We attribute this contrast to the long-term experience of Egyptians in perceiving and recognising faces with headscarves, which might develop more expertise in processing the internal than the external features of unfamiliar faces.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike (2008) Attention to upside-down faces: An exception to the inversion effect. Vision Research, 48 (25). pp. 2555-2561. ISSN 0042-6989.

    Abstract

    When faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. Here we report an instance where this face inversion effect is not found. In a visual cueing paradigm an inverted face was paired with an inverted object in a cue display, followed by a target in one of the cue locations (Experiment 1). Responses were faster to face-cued targets, indicating an attention bias for inverted faces. When upright and inverted face cues were paired in Experiment 2, no attention bias for either cue type was found, suggesting that attention was drawn equally to both types of stimuli. Despite this, attention could be biased selectively toward upright or inverted faces in Experiment 3, by manipulating the predic- tiveness of either type of cue, which shows that observers can distinguish upright and inverted faces under these conditions. A fourth experiment provided a replication of Experiment 2 with an extended stimulus set and increased task demands. These findings suggest that visual attributes that can influence the allocation of an observer’s attention to faces are available in both upright and inverted orientations.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike and Langton, Stephen R.H. (2008) How do eye gaze and facial expression interact? Visual Cognition, 16 (6). pp. 708-733. ISSN 1350-6285.

    Abstract

    Previous research has demonstrated an interaction between eye gaze and selected facial emotional expressions, whereby the perception of anger and happiness is impaired when the eyes are horizontally averted within a face, but the perception of fear and sadness is enhanced under the same conditions. The current study reexamined these claims over six experiments. In the first three experiments, the categorization of happy and sad expressions (Experiments 1 and 2) and angry and fearful expressions (Experiment 3) was impaired when eye gaze was averted, in comparison to direct gaze conditions. Experiment 4 replicated these findings in a rating task, which combined all four expressions within the same design. Experiments 5 and 6 then showed that previous findings, that the perception of selected expressions is enhanced under averted gaze, are stimulus and task-bound. The results are discussed in relation to research on facial expression processing and visual attention.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike and Leuthold, Hartmut et al. (2008) Brain potential correlates of face recognition: Geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. Psychophysiology, 45 (4). pp. 535-544. ISSN 0048-5772.

    Abstract

    The N250r is an event-related potential that has been related to activation of image-independent representations of familiar faces during recognition. However, N250r also shows a degree of image specificity, with reduced activation across repetitions of different images of the same face compared to repetitions across the same image, suggesting a component that codes the visual overlap between two face images. This study investigated whether N250r is equally attenuated when horizontally or vertically stretched faces prime an unstretched image of the same face. The results confirm that N250r is larger across repetitions of the same face image than across different images of the same face. Despite this, N250r was equivalent for priming by the same face image and priming from stretched onto unstretched faces. This finding demonstrates that N250r does not simply reflect the superficial visual overlap between two face images and supports the notion that it is related to person recognition.

    pdf
    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike and Langton, Stephen R.H. et al. (2007) The control of attention to faces. Journal of Vision, 7 (10:15). pp. 1-8. ISSN 1534-7362.

    Abstract

    Humans attend to faces. This study examines the extent to which attention biases to faces are under top-down control. In a visual cueing paradigm, observers responded faster to a target probe appearing in the location of a face cue than of a competing object cue (Experiments 1a and 2a). This effect could be reversed when faces were negatively predictive of the likely target location, making it beneficial to attend to the object cues (Experiments 1b and 2b). It was easier still to strategically shift attention to predictive face cues (Experiment 2c), indicating that the endogenous allocation of attention was augmented here by an additional effect. However, faces merely delayed the voluntary deployment of attention to object cues, but they could not prevent it, even at short cue–target intervals. This finding suggests that attention biases for faces can be rapidly countered by an observer’s endogenous control.

    Bindemann, Markus and Jenkins, Rob and Burton, A. Mike (2007) A Bottleneck in Face Identification: Repetition Priming from Flanker Images. Experimental Psychology, 54 (3). pp. 192-201. ISSN 1618-3169.

    Abstract

    There is evidence that face processing is capacity-limited in distractor interference tasks and in tasks requiring overt recognition memory. We examined whether capacity limits for faces can be observed with a more sensitive measure of visual processing, by measuring repetition priming of flanker faces that were presented alongside a face or a nonface target. In Experiment 1, we found identity priming for face flankers, by measuring repetition priming across a change in image, during task-relevant nonface processing, but not during the processing of a concurrently-presented face target. Experiment 2 showed perceptual priming of the flanker faces, across identical images at prime and test, when they were presented alongside a face target. In a third Experiment, all of these effects were replicated by measuring identity priming and perceptual priming within the same task. Overall, these results imply that face processing is capacity limited, such that only a single face can be identified at one time. Merely attending to a target face appears sufficient to trigger these capacity limits, thereby extinguishing identification of a second face in the display, although our results demonstrate that the additional face remains at least subject to superficial image processing.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike and Jenkins, Rob (2005) Capacity limits for face processing. Cognition, 98. pp. 177-197.

    Abstract

    We present three experiments in which subjects were asked to make speeded sex judgements (Experiment 1) or semantic judgements (Experiments 2 and 3) to face targets and nonface items, while ignoring a solitary flanking distractor face or a nonface stimulus. Distractors could be either congruent (same response category) or incongruent (different response category) with the target. Distractor congruency effects were consistently observed in all combinations of target–distractor stimulus pairs, except when a distractor face flanked a target face. The failure to find congruency effects in this condition was explored further in a fourth experiment, in which four task-irrelevant flankers were simultaneously presented. Once again, no face–face congruency effects were found, even though comparison distractors interfered with face and nonface targets alike. However, four simultaneously presented distractor faces did not interfere with nonface targets either. We suggest that these experiments demonstrate a capacity limit for visual processing in these conditions, such that no more than one face is processed at a time.

    Bindemann, Markus and Burton, A. Mike and Hooge, Ignace T.C. et al. (2005) Faces retain attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12 (6). pp. 1048-1053.

    Abstract

    In the present study, we investigated whether faces have an advantage in retaining attention over other stimulus categories. In three experiments, subjects were asked to focus on a central go/no-go signal before classifying a concurrently presented peripheral line target. In Experiment 1, the go/no-go signal could be superimposed on photographs of upright famous faces, matching inverted faces, or meaningful objects. Experiments 2 and 3 tested upright and inverted unfamiliar faces, printed names, and another class of meaningful objects in an identical design. A fourth experiment provided a replica- tion of Experiment 1, but with a 1,000-msec stimulus onset asynchrony between the onset of the cen- tral face/nonface stimuli and the peripheral targets. In all the experiments, the presence of an upright face significantly delayed target response times, in comparison with each of the other stimulus cat- egories. These results suggest a general attentional bias, so that it is particularly difficult to disengage processing resources from faces.

Total publications in KAR: 23 [See all in KAR]
Information obtained from the Kent Academic Repository. The University of Kent official repository of academic activity.
More information about the Kent Academic Repository

 

Grants

2010

Experimental Psychology Society
Undergraduate Research Bursary
Examining the two-perpetrator disadvantage in eyewitness identification

£2,000

2009

Knowledge Transfer Innovation Fund
University of Essex
Establishing Café Scientifique in Colchester
Named applicant, member of steering group, and contributor.

£3,037

2009

Research Promotion Fund
University of Essex
Individual variation and observer consistency in unfamiliar face identification

£4,600

2008

Experimental Psychology Society
Undergraduate Research Bursary
Interactions of eye-gaze and facial expression

£1,600

2007-09

Human face detection in natural scenes
Economic and Social Research Council
Co-Investigator with Mike Burton
End of award report rated “Outstanding” by Evaluation Directorate

£152,571

 

Other academic activities

European Degrees and Erasmus Coordinator

Professional memberships

Experimental Psychology Society (EPS)

British Psychological Society (BPS)

BPS - Cognitive Section

Contact details

Address:

School of Psychology
Keynes College
University of Kent
Canterbury
Kent
CT2 7NP
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)1227 823087
Fax: +44 (0)1227 827030
Email: M.Bindemann@kent.ac.uk
   
Office: Keynes A3.06
Office Hours: Monday 2-3pm, Friday 3-4pm

 

School of Psychology - Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NP

Tel: +44 (0)1227 824775; Fax: +44 (0)1227 827030 or Email the School

Last Updated: 14/03/2012