A selection of research projects lead by the Centre for the Study of Higher Education
Developing a framework for powerful student learning experiences
Are there a core set of experiences that all undergraduate students should have in an increasingly diverse university? If so, what would those be? Those were the central questions that prompted the development of a Framework for Powerful Student Learning Experiences at the University of Kent. An extensive consultation, with input from more than 1770 students and over 60 staff members during academic year 2017-18, yielded a framework of six principles that describe what all undergraduate students should experience during their learning journey at the University of Kent. All Kent students should experience:
- Learning that is relevant to their goals, interests, and ambitions.
- Practice with and feedback on intellectual skills and active engagement with key ideas.
- A challenging, supportive, inclusive environment.
- Interactions with diverse peers that support them in learning about their subject, becoming familiar with other cultures, appreciating different points of view, and developing communication skills.
- Meaningful interactions with academics, staff or mentors.
- At least one “high impact” practice that integrates Principles 1-5, such as a work experience, independent project, public exhibition/performance, study abroad, or series of interactive seminars.
To learn more about each principle, see recommendations for how the university can further embed them, and find links to examples of practices that illustrate the principles, see the full project report here. The project was sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor for Education on behalf of the Student Experience Board and the Kent Union.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Kathleen M. Quinlan
Recognise and Articulate Leadership in Learning and Teaching
Through this project, we will investigate the impact of participating in Kent’s new Route to Recognition for Experienced Staff (HEA RRES) on applicants seeking Senior Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA). We focus on SFHEA (D3) as this recognises leadership of teaching and learning. The UK Professional Standards for D3.VII states ‘Successful coordination, support, supervision, management and/or mentoring of others (whether individuals and/or teams) in relation to learning and teaching. The capacity to support, mentor and assess’. This criterion distinguishes SFHEA from Fellowship of the HEA (FHEA, D2). HEA RRES engages with colleagues whose practice affects or has the potential to affect other staff and students; that is not a requirement for AFHEA or FHEA. The educational development interventions at D3 are therefore expected to yield much greater gains for the institution than dealing with individual lecturers directly (through FHEA D2 claims).
This project will measure the effectiveness of HEA RRES, by looking at the participant’s experiences of HEA RRES and the creation of a Senior Fellowship (D3) Claim. It will generate qualitative data through semi-structured interviews, providing a basis for improving the RRES. The study will allow recent participants of RRES the opportunity to reflect and discuss their thoughts on the contributions of various parts of the Claim process. It will gather the views of participants to understand the possible impact of their participation on both quality enhancement of learning and teaching and the professional development of participants. In May through to September 2018, interviews will be undertaken with participants from our 1st and 2nd cohorts (i.e. March and June 2018), up to 20 participants from a variety of roles who have completed an SFHEA Claim. Individual Claims will be discussed with participants as part of the interview. Questions will be grouped initially around the themes below; motivations to participate, how they engaged with the reflective process (Kolb, 1984) and the impact of developing a Claim on their leadership.
- Motivation to complete a Claim for recognition and the anticipated impact of achieving SFHEA
- Reasons for engaging with HEA RRES, their reflections and perceptions of the process of developing a Claim, what barriers (if any there were to engaging) and any changes to their leadership/collaboration because of the development of a Claim.
- Impact of the development of an SFHEA Claim on their view of their leadership using Quinlan’s (2014) educational leadership framework as a conceptual lens.
This project was awarded a TESSA
If you have any questions, please contact Dr Julia Hope
Society for Research in Higher Education Project
Dual Professionals in Higher Education: From Professional Practitioner to Lecturer.
This study aims to investigate the transition experiences of disciplinary professional practitioners in the UK who have current or recent industry experience and are making a mid-career transition to being academics (Locke & Bennion, 2009). These disciplinary professional practitioners (accountants, social workers, journalists) are here termed ‘dual professionals’ and the study addresses the following questions:
- what supports and hinders their new identity formation as lecturers?
- how does participation in new communities of practice in HE (e.g. professional development, academic discipline, and their HEI) affect their transition, beliefs and their view of themselves?
- how do dual professionals’ beliefs about teaching and their transition experiences differ by discipline and by institution?
The intention is to gain a deeper understanding of dual professional as early career academics (ECAs), how their beliefs about university teaching and learning are framed and evolve, and to interrogate their beliefs about being lecturers (Dallí Alba, 2005, Clemans et al. 2010). This study considers what transition means for these dual professionals, how it is experienced and how the participants perceived institutionally provided professional development contributing to this transition. The proposed study will explore how their prior experience and embedded tacit knowledge (Eraut, 2000) influence these perceptions and attitudes. Given that the participants all have a vast store of tacit knowledge gained from their years of professional practice, the study will also look at how this prior experience contributes to their perceptions of and attitudes towards professional development.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr Julia Hope
What triggers' students' interest during lectures?
Lecturing is often touted as a means to inspire students’ interest, yet many lectures fail to do so. This study, funded through a University of Kent Teaching Enhancement Small Support Award, examined what triggers students’ interest during lectures. Students (N=706) in 12 different one-hour first year lectures were surveyed at the end of the lecture. They described the moment they felt most interested; rated a series of 5-point Likert scale items on their situational and individual interest, and rated features of the content, presentation, and teachers’ behaviour during that moment. Findings showed that students were most interested in those moments when teachers presented new information, prompted students to think (without overchallenging them), and highlighted the usefulness of material (often through stories and examples). Students’ interest was piqued, too, when they perceived teachers were particularly enthusiastic, approachable, friendly and knowledgeable.
The project also yielded examples of practices that illustrate the key findings. Findings have been presented in and outside the university, a manuscript is in submission and a second is in preparation.
If you would like to learn more about the project or arrange a presentation, please contact Dr Kathleen M Quinlan.