This module is not currently running in 2024 to 2025.
The course follows the general line of the module International Relations Theory (PO824), but focuses debates and cases on the relation between International Relations and International Law, the diffusion of norms, compliance, governance, hard and soft law.
The course starts by raising the problem of perception in International Relations and by highlighting some of the core dividing lines underlying theoretical debates (explaining/understanding, positivism/post-positivism, rationalism/constructivism, etc.). It critically looks into the Levels of Analysis approach and brings up the Agency-Structure problem. After having set the parmeters of the debate, different theories are studied in depth: Classical Realism, Structural Realism, Liberalism, Neo-Liberal Institutionalism, the neo-neo debate, Constructivism, the English School, normative theory, Marxism and Critical Theory. To conclude, the course treats two major, related debates about the state of the world: one on the post-Cold War (dis)order, the other on globalization. This allows to demonstrate how theories interrelate and how they can be applied to current events.
The specific International Law dimension consists of four major parts:
• the (sometimes problematic) relation between the disciplines of International Relations (IR) and International Law (IL) and between politics and law
• the assessment of International Law by the different theoretical strands
• international institutions, international regimes, norms and compliance
• the role of law in a changing world: governance and globalisation
Autumn
Students write one essay of approximately 5000 words on a topic relating International Relations theory to international law
Dunne T., Kurki M., Smith S. (2007), International Relations. Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press.
Carlsnaes W., Risse T.,Simmons B. (eds.) (2006), Handbook of International Relations. London, Sage.
Byers, M (ed.) (2000), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law. Oxford University Press.
Barker J. C. (2000), International Law and International Relations. London, Continuum.
Arend, A. C. (1999), Legal Rules and International Society. Oxford University Press.
Hsuing J. (1997), Anarchy and Order: The Interplay of Politics and Law in International Relations.
Lynne Reinner, 1997.
See the library reading list for this module (Canterbury)
The intended subject specific learning outcomes and, as appropriate, their relationship to programme learning outcomes
On successful completion of the module, students will:
- understand the complexity of international issues and the extent to which politics relates to, informs, and is shaped by, the international legal and normative frameworks
- be able to explain and understand key debates and core concepts in IR, particularly as they relate to concepts of law
- be able to critically analyse IR theories and their normative dimensions
- identify the practical and ethical problems and limits of international law, state sovereignty, and international justice with regard to key state and non-state practices
- be able to use IR theories and concepts to analyse current international issues in the field of International Law
- be able to identify dividing lines between different theories and how they relate to International Law
These specific learning outcomes contribute to achieving the learning outcomes of our postgraduate programmes by demonstrating knowledge of the following:
• key concepts, theories and methods used in the study of politics and international relations and their application to the analysis of political ideas, institutions, practices and issues in the global arena
• the political dynamics of interaction between people, events, ideas and institutions
• the contestable nature of many concepts and different approaches to the study of Politics and International Relations
• the normative and positive foundations of political ideas
• the nature and significance of politics as a global activity
• different interpretations of world political events and issues.
The intended generic learning outcomes and, as appropriate, their relationship to programme learning outcomes
Students who successfully complete this module:
- will be able to work with theoretical knowledge and apply theory to practical issues
- will be aware of the relationships between international politics and international law, as these developed as related but distinct fields of knowledge
- will be able to undertake analysis of complex debates and make carefully constructed arguments
- will have a level of conceptual understanding that will allow them to evaluate critically research, policies, and practices
- will be reflective and self-critical in their work
- will be able to engage in academic and professional communication with others
- will have independent learning ability required for further study or professional work
By helping students to progress towards these generic learning outcomes, the module contributes to achieving the general aims of our postgraduate programmes, which aim to
• Provide the tools to evaluate different interpretations of world political events and issues;
• Communicate effectively and fluently in speech and writing;
• Identify, investigate, analyse, formulate and advocate solutions to problems;
• Develop reasoned arguments, synthesise relevant information and exercise critical judgement
• Work independently, demonstrating initiative, self-organization and time-management
University of Kent makes every effort to ensure that module information is accurate for the relevant academic session and to provide educational services as described. However, courses, services and other matters may be subject to change. Please read our full disclaimer.
