Careers and Employability Service

Teamworking Skills

 

teamwork

 

All employers are keen to recruit graduates who are able to cooperate, solve problemsand work in teams. As less hierarchical organisations have emerged with project teams, self-managed work teams and management teams, so the requirements to 'Get on well with people', and to 'Work with and through others' become increasingly important.

Teamwork involves working confidently within a group, contributing your own ideas effectively, taking a share of the responsibility, being assertive - rather than passive or aggressive, accepting and learning from constructive criticism and giving positive, constructive feedback to others.

Exercise on teamworking skills.

The questionnaire which follows should help you to analyse the workings of a group and should help you to reach some tentative conclusions about your role in a team. For this exercise you will need to think of teams of which you are or were a part. These could be project groups for your course, seminar groups, sports teams, societies or clubs in which you were involved, vacation jobs in which you were part of a team, or even perhaps when you were sharing a house with a group of students.

Try to answer the 28 questions as honestly as you can. Click on "First Question" to begin. Please try to answer ALL the questions. You can go back to questions to change your answers by clicking on the previous question button.


Rarely
Sometimes 

Frequently

Always

Scores:

  

 

Test designed and developed by Bruce Woodcock

Your score

Your score can be from 0 to a maximum of 12 on each of seven group roles. Make a note of your scores or print out the page and then see below to find out what these roles involve.

 

The roles people play in meetings.

There are a number of different roles that people adopt in meetings, some of which are listed below. These roles are not always constant - one person might adopt several of these roles during one meeting or change roles depending on what is being discussed. Your score for each category should give you some idea of which of these roles you play in teams.

ENCOURAGER

Energises groups when motivation is low through humour or through being enthusiastic.They are positive individuals who support and praise other group members. They don't like sitting around. They like to move things along by suggesting ideas, by clarifying the ideas of others and by confronting problems. They may use humour to break tensions in the group.

They may say:
"We CAN do this!"
"That's a great idea!"


COMPROMISER

Destructive or selfish group roles to avoid!

  • Autocrat: tries to dominate or constantly interrupt other members of the team.
  • Show Off: talks all the time and thinks they know all the answers.
  • Butterfly: keeps changing the topic before others are ready.
  • Aggressor: doesn't show respect to others, comments negatively about them.
  • Avoider: refuses to focus on the task or on group relationship problems.
  • Critic: always sees the negative side to any argument, but never suggests alternatives. Puts down the ideas of others.
  • Help seeker: looks for sympathy from others: victim
  • Self-confessor: uses the group as a forum for inappropriate talk about self.
  • Clown: shows no involvement in group and engages in distracting communication.

A committee is a group of people who individually can do nothing, but who, as a group, can meet and decide that nothing can be done.

Fred Allen

Meetings in UK offices account for 40 million working hours per week, with 7.5 million deemed a waste of time.

Tries to maintain harmony among the team members. They are sociable, interested in others and will introduce people, draw them out and make them feel comfortable. They may be willing to change their own views to get a group decision. They work well with different people and can be depended on to promote a positive atmosphere, helping the team to gel. They pull people and tasks together thereby developing rapport. They are tolerant individuals and good listeners who will listen carefully to the views of other group members. They are good judges of people, diplomatic and sensitive to the feelings of others and not seen as a threat. They are able to recognise and resolve differences of opinion and the the development of conflict, they enable "difficult" team-members to contribute positively.
They may say:
"We haven't heard from Mike yet: I'd like to hear what you think about this." 
"I'm not sure I agree. What are your reasons for saying that?"

LEADER

Good leaders direct the sequence of steps the group takes and keep the group "on-track". They are good at controlling people and events and coordinating resources. They have the energy, determination and initiative to overcome obstacles and bring competitive drive to the team. They give shape to the team effort. They recognise the skills of each individual and how they can be used. Leaders are outgoing individuals who have to be careful not to be domineering. They can sometimes steamroller the team but get results quickly. They may become impatient with complacency and lack of progress and may sometimes overreact. Also see our leadership styles test.

They may say
"Let's come back to this later if we have time." 
"We need to move on to the next step." 
"Sue, what do you think about this idea?"

SUMMARISER/CLARIFIER

Calm, reflective individuals who summarise the group's discussion and conclusions. They clarify group objectives and elaborate on the ideas of others. They may go into detail about how the group's plans would work and tie up loose ends. They are good mediators and seek consensus.

They may say: 
"So here's what we've decided so far"
"I think you're right, but we could also add ...."

The “Top Ten” Skills shortages among graduates

% of employers surveyed
1 Commercial Awareness      67%
2 Communication Skills 64%
3 Leadership 33%
4 Ability to work in a team 33%
5 Problem solving 32%
6 Conceptual ability 21%
7 Subject Knowledge & competence 19%
8 Foreign languages     19%
9 Numeracy 19%
10 Good general education 15%

Source: Association of Graduate Recruiters “Skills for Graduates in the 21st Century” www.agr.org.uk

IDEAS PERSON

The ideas person suggests new ideas to solve group problems or suggests new ways for the group to organize the task. They dislike orthodoxy and are not too concerned with practicalities. They provide suggestions and proposals that are often original and radical. They are more concerned with the big picture than with details. They may get bored after the initial impetus wears off. See our lateral thinking skills page

They may say
"Why don't we consider doing it this way?"

EVALUATOR

Evaluators help the group to avoid coming to agreement too quickly. They tend to be slow in coming to a decision because of a need to think things over. They are the logical, analytical, objective people in the team and offer measured, dispassionate critical analysis. They contribute at times of crucial decision making because they are capable of evaluating competing proposals. They may suggest alternative ideas.

They may say:
"What other possibilities are there?" 
or "Let's try to look at this another way." 
or "I'm not sure we're on the right track."

RECORDER

The recorder keeps the group focused and organised. They make sure that everyone is helping with the project. They are usually the first person to offer to take notes to keep a record of ideas and decisions. They also like to act as time-keeper, to allocate times to specific tasks and remind the team to keep to them, or act as a spokesperson, to deliver the ideas and findings of the group. They may check that all members understand and agree on plans and actions and know their roles and responsibilities. They act as the memory of the group.

They may say:
"We only have five minutes left, so we need to come to agreement now!"
"Do we all understand this chart?"
"Are we all in agreement on this?"

teamwork

What makes an effective team?

  • It has a range of individuals who contribute in different ways (see the roles above) and complement each other. A team made up just of planners would find it difficult to cope with changing deadlines or plans whereas a team full of spontaneous individuals would be disorganised: you need both types. A good team produces more than the individual contributions of members.
  • Clear goals are agreed on that everyone understands and is committed to.
  • Everyone understands the tasks they have to do and helps each other.Picture of interviewee
  • It has a coordinator who may adopt a leadership style from autocratic to democratic depending on the circumstances. Different people may assume the role of leader for different tasks.
  • There is a balance between the task (what do we need to do?) and the process (how do we achieve this?)
  • There is a supportive, informal atmospherewhere members feel able to take risks and say what they think.
  • The group is comfortable with disagreement and can successfully overcome differences in opinion.
  • There is a lot of discussion in which everyone participates. Group members listen to each other and everyone's ideas are heard.
  • Members feel free to criticise and say what they think but this is done in a positive, constructive manner.
  • The group learns from experience: reviewing and improving performance in the light of both successes and failures.
  • Great Teams Are About Personalities, Not Just Skills

What makes an ineffective team

 

After all is said and done, more is said than done.
Aesop

  • People talk more than they listen and only a few people may contribute.
  • Some members are silent and don't contribute. They may be indifferent, bored or afraid to contribute.
  • Members ideas are dismissed or even ridiculed and their views are ignored.
  • There are arguments between members of the group (as opposed to constructive differences of opinion).
  • One or two members dominate the others and make the decisions.
  • Disagreements are put to the vote without being discussed.
  • Some members are unhappy with decisions and grumble privately afterwards.
  • Little effort is made to keep to the point or to work to deadlines.
  • There is a lack of clarity regarding goals and specific tasks are not agreed to.
  • Roles are not delegated to particular team members.
  • There is a lack of trust and helpfulness.
  • Members don't talk about how the group is working or the problems it faces.

 

Tips for group work exercises in selection centres.

  • Committee: a group of people that keeps minutes and wastes hours.
  • Committee: Individuals who can do nothing individually and sit to decide that nothing can be done together.
  • If you want to kill any idea in the world, get a committee working on it. (Charles Kettering)
  • Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
  • Conference: The confusion of one person multiplied by the number present.
  • Conference Room: A place where everybody talks, nobody listens & everybody disagrees.
  • Lecture: The art of transferring information from the notes of the lecturer to the notes of the student without passing through the minds of either.
  • Real work is done outside meetings, not in them!
  • After all is said and done, more is usually said than done.

If you are invited to a selection centre as part of the interview process, it's very likely that you will have a group task, such as a case study, where your performance in the group will be assessed. Here are some tips to help you to perform well. For more on assessment centres see our page on this.

  • Read a quality newspaper in the weeks before the assessment centre - sometimes topics for discussion will be based on recent items in the news.
  • When you read the information given for a group exercise, underline key points and the likely arguments and counter arguments. Look for any red herrings (irrelevant or misleading facts).
  • Try to be yourself. Don't try to put on a façade or mask.
  • Talk to the other candidates and assessors between exercises to help keep yourself relaxed.
  • Keep a note of the finish time. Don't allow the group to over-run. Statements like "look we only have 5 minutes left so we need to get a move on"may help.
  • For some exercises (e.g. balloon debates) it helps to decide on the criteria on which you will make your choices and then stick to this. For example if you have to decide who to save from a sinking ship, do you save the youngest, the fittest or the ones with useful skills? Spend time in preparation and planning rather than just jumping in - decide your objectives and priorities, but don't take too long and get bogged down at this stage.
  • If a particular group member is quiet try to get them to contribute. It's a good idea to encourage them along the lines "We haven't heard from Mike yet - I'd like to hear what you think of the proposal."
  • Voting for a particular choice is a last resort and should only be used if persuasion and consensus have failed and time is running out.
    Questions they might expect to face at most interviews (e.g. asking for an example of team building, or showing that they are a fast learner) are difficult to answer well if you are not used to them, and haven’t prepared a list of examples to draw from. We’d recommend that students consider why we’re asking the question. For example, a good answer on team building outlines difficulties you may have had with other team-members and shows that you understand what you need to do to overcome those difficulties, rather than simply to tell the interviewer that the team worked together really well.

    Civil Service

  • Stick up for your opinions and argue persuasively and with logic for them, but also listen to the opinions of others and support those you agree with. Don't belittle the ideas of others - in most cases you're not competing directly against the other members of the group - everyone could be selected or everyone rejected.
  • Go for quality rather than quantity in your contributions. Don't talk aimlessly. Try to move the group forward by your contributions e.g. "Look this is now going anywhere. Why don't we move on and come back to this topic later"
  • Summarising can sometimes help to clarify the position. "Before we go on shall I summarise what we've agreed"
  • If a dominant individual tries to "hijack" the group, don't be afraid to challenge them, but do this calmly, logically and diplomatically, not by attacking them. You could ask "What are your reasons for saying that?"
  • If you are made the leader of an exercise it's a good idea to ask for volunteers for particular tasks such as note taking, and to delegate responsibility. Identify the strengths of the other group members and use them. Don't get too involved in the fine detail of the task - your role as the leader is to keep an overview.
  • Keep cool and use your sense of humour. Be assertive, tactful and persuasive and work with the group. Listen to what everyone has to say. Don't interrupt or put down other group members.
  • Try to be creative - introduce new ideas or build on the ideas of others.

Group exercises Kent students have been asked to undertake at selection centres

  • A discussion on who we would save given that X amount of people were in a cave, and the cave entrance had collapsed, so chances were that some people were going to die. We had to decide on the order of rescue. (Cable & Wireless)
  • Given 4 plastic cups, 4 plates, masking tape and 8 sheets of very large paper, construct a bridge capable of holding a stapler (the stapler isn't seen until you've finished). (Cable & Wireless)
  • A choice of two possible factory buildings: you have to make a decision as to which one you would choose. They give you info such as budget and details about each building. Don't think there is a right or wrong answer; you just have to justify what you value to be the most important criteria. (AXA)
  • We were a small start up company who were to create and organise an event for the launch of the 2012 Olympics. There are certain requirements such as budget and time scales but the rest is up to you to come up with something appropriate. 50 minutes to prepare and then 10 minutes to present it as a group. (ATOS Origin)

    Companies are wasting thousands of poundes every day on irrelevant meetings

    A study by Protecting.co.uk found that a one hour meeting attended by ten staff costs at least £250 in salaries alone.

    "The sad fact is that many meetings can be replaced with something cheaper and more efficient, with annual savings running into thousands," said Protecting.co.uk spokesperson Mark Hall.

    The average British employee will sit through 6,240 meetings in their career. 60% of the workers studied described meetings as “pointless”. 20% had dozed off during a meeting. 70% said they constantly zone out in meetings. Nearly half spend their time doodling and 29% stare aimlessly out of a window. Many said that a quick and concise conference call was more effective than a lengthy meeting which often resulted in expensive travel expenses.

 

Tips and comments from Kent students:

  • Have a watch and use it! Don't forget to remember when an exercise started and how long you've got to prepare it. Also, decide on a time keeper for the group tasks.
  • Be yourself, relax and enjoy. You will feel challenged, and feel very tired, but that's expected!
  • The most important aspect is your interaction in the group. You must speak and play a prominent part in the exercise, not just react to other people. However, do not be overbearing and try to listen to others too.
  • Relax and enjoy the day. Ask lots of questions.
  • You really are marked on the key competenciesthey provide you with, and you are given plenty of opportunities to demonstrate these skills. If you are aware of the competencies and think about the task, it is quite clear through the exercises which skills you should be using.
  • The assessments were deliberately organised to put pressure on you time-wise. The point of most of the assessments didn't seem to be getting to the correct answer but seeing how you got there: so bear this in mind. One or two of the candidates tried too hard to impress and were very overbearing when it came to the group exercises: I'm not sure that this is what the assessors were looking for and it certainly didn't make them popular with the other candidates!
  • A group of 8 candidates sat around a table and discussed a business proposal whilst 8 assessors sat around edge of room taking notes on us. This lasted for about ¾ hour. 
  • Take initiatives e.g. in group discussions go use the flip chart, propose to use it, watch the time. Show enthusiasm: this is very important when telling about an event in an assessment centre. Biggest hurdle is the time. Always watch for the time while you are working. (Ernst & Young)
  • There are always people watching so be careful about what you say/who you say it to/when you say it.  Be friendly to the other candidates. (Deloitte)
  • During group work, always keep and eye on the time and make sure the panel can see you're doing this. Encourage everyone in your group to contribute and listen to their ideas.
  • The biggest thing that gave me confidence was the realisation that not only was everyone else nervous, the other candidates were very friendly with each other in general. I took it as an opportunity to chat to people in the breaks and I actually forgot I was probably being assessed as I was enjoying myself! I also found it helped to make small talk with the interviewers.
  • Time management is pretty crucial in individual tasks and I suspect you get brownie points for keeping on top of this in group tasks too. Also remind yourself that what you're doing is good experience, and will teach you valuable lessons regardless of the outcome.

You can also benefit by asking yourself some other questions:

  • Where do you fit in? What is your role in groups?
  • Are you a player or an observer?
  • Do you cooperate with others, lead, follow, contribute, guide, advise or just watch?
  • Should you take a more active role?
  • Should you contribute more?
  • Have you a dominant personality? If so - should you encourage others to contribute?
  • Good group work, effective committees and successful management teams are based on effective contributions from everyone. Where do you fit in? Cooperating with others is vital for every type of management task!

You might like to use the following headings to make notes or, the contributions of particular group members.

Observer assessment form for group exercises

Here are the sort of criteria on which your contributions to a group exercise at a selection centre might be assessed. You might like to use them to make notes on the contributions of particular group members.

Participation

  • Participates enthusiastically in discussion.
  • Actively influences events rather than passively accepting.
  • Acts on opportunities: originates action.

Spoken Expression

  • Expresses his/herself clearly and coherently.
  • Makes a clear persuasive presentation of ideas and facts

Originality of Ideas

  • Introduces new ideas.
  • Builds constructively an the ideas of others.
  • Brings a fresh approach to a problem.

Quality of Thought

  • Analyses the problem well.
  • Gets to the root of the problem: can recognise which information is important and which is peripheral.
  • Can evaluate data and courses of action, draw sound inferences and reach logical decisions.

Influence on Others

  • Makes a point which is accepted by the other members.
  • Influences the direction and nature of the discussion.

Open Mindedness

  • Listens to carefully to other members' views.
  • Incorporates the points made by others into their own.
  • Shows tact and diplomacy

Facilitation of the Discussion

  • Makes a direct attempt to help another person.
  • Squashes a dominant interrupter to allow someone else to make a point.

Judgment

  • Discriminates clearly between the important and the trivial.
  • Does not allow his/her feelings to sway decisions: unbiased and rational.

 

 

There was once a team of four individuals called respectively: Everyone, Someone, Anyone and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everyone was sure that Someone would do it.
Anyone could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Someone got angry about this, because it was Everyone’s job.
Everyone thought Anyone could do it, but Nobody realised that Everyone wouldn’t do it.
It ended up that Everyone blamed Someone when Nobody did what Anyone could have done

 

 

Careers and Employability Service - © University of Kent

The University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7ND, T: +44 (0)1227 764000 ext. 3299

Last Updated: 05/04/2018