Professor Nick Grief
Nick has a BA in Law with a Language (French) and a PhD in International Law, both from Kent, and is a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. Before returning to Kent in 2010, he taught at Bournemouth University (1998-2009, including 8 years as Head of School) and the University of Exeter (1979-1997, including 2 years as Head of the Law Department). He has been a Visiting Professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law and is a member of the Center of Theological Inquiry, Princeton.
In 2007 Nick gave evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee on the legal implications of the White Paper on ‘The future of the United Kingdom’s strategic nuclear deterrent’. In the 1990s he was closely involved in the World Court Project (notably as the author of a legal memorandum entitled ‘The World Court Project on Nuclear Weapons and International Law’) which led to the ICJ's Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons in July 1996.
For many years Nick delivered EU law training for the Government Legal Service, the Financial Conduct Authority and the National Assembly for Wales, and from 1999 to 2008 he was joint editor of the European Human Rights Reports. He is on the editorial board of The International Journal of Human Rights (Routledge).
Nick is collaborating with Kent colleague and internationally acclaimed visual artist Shona Illingworth (School of Music and Fine Art) on a major international project, the Airspace Tribunal, advocating the recognition of a new human right to protect the freedom to exist without physical or psychological threat from above.
Nicks teaching responsibilities span across EU Law and Undergraduate and Postgraduate supervision.
Nick is happy to supervise in the following areas:
- Public international law, especially international humanitarian law, international criminal law, air and space law
- Human rights, especially the right to protest and conscientious objection to the payment of taxes for military purposes
- EU law, especially the protection of fundamental rights
Nick practises as a barrister from Doughty Street Chambers, London (https://www.doughtystreet.co.uk/barristers/profile/professor-nick-grief). From April 2014 to October 2016 he was a member of the legal team which represented the Marshall Islands before the International Court of Justice in nuclear disarmament cases against India, Pakistan and the UK. Other notable cases in which he has appeared as counsel include R v Margaret Jones and Paul Milling, Bristol Crown Court, September 2006 (in which the defendants were charged with conspiracy to cause criminal damage at RAF Fairford on the eve of the Iraq war), R v Jones and others  UKHL 16 (on whether the crime of aggression was capable of being a crime in domestic law) and A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2)  UKHL 71 (on the admissibility of evidence procured by torture of a third party by foreign agents). He has also been instructed as an expert witness on International law and EU law.
Grief, N. et al. (2018). The Airspace Tribunal: Towards a New Human Right to Protect the Freedom to Exist Without Physical or Psychological Threat from Above. European Human Rights Law Review:201-207.
Grief, N. (2014). Enforcing the London 2012 Airspace Restrictions: lessons arising from the “lethal force option”. European Human Rights Law Review:142-153.
Grief, N. (2011). Nuclear weapons: the legal status of use, threat and possession. Nuclear Abolition Forum [PDF]:7-13. Available at: http://www.abolitionforum.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NAF-First-issue.online-version.pdf.
Grief, N. and Losy, A. (2010). The Montreal Convention 1999: an increase in the limits of liability. Journal of Business Law:529-532.
Grief, N. (2007). EU Law and Security. European Law Review:752-765.
Grief, N. (2007). Using Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights as a defence to criminal proceedings arising from non-violent direct action against nuclear weapons: the relevance of international law. International Journal of Human Rights [Online] 11:327-347. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642980701443566.This paper explores the application of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to freedom of expression, in the context of criminal proceedings arising from non-violent direct action by protesters against nuclear weapons. It does so with reference to the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion in the Nuclear Weapons Case, Strasbourg case law, and domestic cases in which individuals were prosecuted for causing damage at military bases. It argues that since the rule of law is a fundamental principle of a democratic society, interference by a State with the exercise of the right to freedom of expression cannot be ‘necessary in a democratic society’ for the purposes of Article 10(2) unless it is shown to be consistent with the State's obligations under international law. It also reveals the potentially powerful interaction of national law, international law, and the European Convention. This is particularly important in the light of recent remarks about the limits of self-help and civil disobedience.
Grief, N. (2006). The exclusion of foreign torture evidence: a qualified victory for the rule of law. European Human Rights Law Review.
Grief, N. (2011). Deterrence: The Legal Context. in: Johnson, R. and Zelter, A. eds. Trident and International Law. Luath Press, pp. 172-176.
Grief, N. (2008). The "War Crimes" and "International Criminal Law" entries. in: Cane, P. and Conaghan, J. eds. The New Oxford Companion to Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grief, N. (2008). The Iraq War: Issues of International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law. in: Williams, A. and Shiner, P. eds. The Iraq War and International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 95-116.
Grief, N. (2008). The domestic reach of general principles of law: First City Trading revisited. in: Barnard, C. ed. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing, pp. 199-214.
Grief, N. (2006). Is Britain’s continued possession and threatened use of nuclear weapons illegal? in: Booth, K. and Barnaby, F. eds. The future of Britain’s nuclear weapons: experts reframe the debate. Oxford: Oxford Research Group, Current Decisions Report, pp. 41-48.
Grief, N. (2004). British Quakers, the Peace Tax and International Law. in: Janis, M. W. and Evans, C. eds. Religion and International Law. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 339-356.