© University of Kent - Contact | Feedback | Legal | Cookies
The University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ, T +44 (0)1227 764000
We are a top-rated teaching department, awarded the maximum score of 24 out of 24 in the Teaching Quality Assessment. We have a thriving research culture with all of the research in the department rated of national or international standard and some world-leading. We have strong links with other disciplines in the University: we run the interdisciplinary Centre for Reasoning and collaborate widely with other subjects both within the School of European Culture and Languages and externally, e.g. with History and Philosophy of Art.
This conference will examine the relation between causality and evidence. This involves questions about the foundations of the sciences, e.g. what is evidence and how does it contribute to causal knowledge? But it also involves questions about specific applications, e.g., how should we best deal with the many problems of evidence given by expert witnesses in court; and questions about policy-making, e.g., what constitutes evidence of causation that is relevant to the design of socio-economic and public health policies? These questions are all of immense current concern. Pressure on health systems from ageing populations and the obesity epidemic, coupled with severe financial constraints on public policy, means governments are demanding answers with increasing urgency.
Evidence-based medicine makes use of a 'hierarchy of evidence' according to which statistical evidence gleaned from randomised controlled trials trumps other kinds of evidence. Recent work on the epistemology of causality has suggested, however, that evidence of the underlying biological mechanisms (e.g., obtained from laboratory investigations), should be treated more on a par with evidence of statistical relationships. This project will explore the consequences of this work for evidence-based medicine, to examine whether improvements can be made to the evaluation of evidence in medicine.
Inductive logic is the logic of reasoning about structure under uncertainty. While a viable inductive logic would be of crucial benefit to the sciences (e.g., biologists need to reason about protein structure in the face of limited evidence), philosophers have hitherto thought that the quest for a viable inductive logic is a hopeless task. This project aims to build on recent developments in probabilistic epistemology to develop a new inductive logic that may be able to survive the key philosophical criticisms to which other logics have succumbed.
It is with great sadness that the University reports the death on 1 January 2012 of Professor Frank Cioffi. Professor Cioffi joined the University of Kent in 1965 and later founded a philosophy department at the University of Essex. Well liked by both students and staff, he will be much missed. Read more about the life and work of Frank Cioffi in his obituary.
Find out about our postgraduate funding opportunities for 2012.
Postdoctoral Research Associate and PhD studentship