What makes History such a contentious topic in modern culture? Why do so many of the discussions about the subject generate so much noise? By examining a series of historical controversies, you'll examine why history can be so controversial, and develop your skills as a historian to locate, assess and critique evidence, arguments and interpretations. Each case study in this module looks at how understandings of historical moments, or the rigour of historical claims, played a central part. From different places and time periods, each case study will unpick the broader claims which have been made, the interpretations that lie behind them, and the implications of how a controversial moment changed the way people understood their pasts. Culture wars, political and technological revolutions, nationalist transformations and moments of radicalism, will all be better understood through prism of historical context. Putting thinking into practice, you’ll learn how to create your own arguments, mobilize historical evidence and judge historical interpretations.
Lectures: 20 hours.
Seminars: 8 hours.
Workshops: 4 hours.
Autumn
Practical. Website Review. Critique a non-academic piece of history (e.g. Wikipedia entry or AI-generated article). (1,500 words). Worth 40%.
Practical. Presentation. Group Presentation (debate format) (20 minutes). Worth 60%.
Reassessment method:
Single instrument 100% written assessment (1,500 words)
The University is committed to ensuring that core reading materials are in accessible electronic format in line with the Kent Inclusive Practices. The most up to date reading list for each module can be found on the university's reading list pages: https://kent.rl.talis.com/index.html
On successfully completing the module, students will be able to:
1. Demonstrate an understanding of a wide variety of historical controversies and engage in debates around them.
2. Evaluate a range of historical sources, both primary and secondary and recognise the problems inherent in historical records.
3. Differentiate between different levels of historical reliability.
4. Review a piece of non-academic writing and formulate a reasoned critique of its reliability.
5. Work effectively independently or in groups to construct and defend a position and argument.
University of Kent makes every effort to ensure that module information is accurate for the relevant academic session and to provide educational services as described. However, courses, services and other matters may be subject to change. Please read our full disclaimer.