School of Psychology

The Kent Face Matching Test

 

Relevant publications

If you are interested in face matching research, then please view our other publications on this and related topics. These publications are available for download here or by request (Email: m.bindemann@kent.ac.uk).

Face Matching – Various
  • Gentry, N. W., & Bindemann, M. (2019). Examples improve facial identity comparison. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.06.002
  • Tummon, H. M., Allen, J., & Bindemann, M. (2019). Facial identification at a virtual reality airport. i-Perception, 10, 2041669519863077. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2041669519863077
  • Robertson, D. J., Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2019). Face identity verification: Five challenges facing practitioners. Keesing Journal of Documents & Identity, 59, 3-8.
  • Bruce, V., Bindemann, M., & Lander, K. (2018). Individual differences in face perception and person recognition. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0109-4
  • Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2018). Human–Computer Interaction in Face Matching. Cognitive Science, 42, 1714-1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12633
  • Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2018). Person identification from drones by humans: Insights from Cognitive Psychology. Drones, 2, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones2040032
  • Fysh, M. C. (2018). Individual differences in the detection, matching, and memory of faces. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0111-x
  • Kokje, E., Bindemann, M., & Megreya, A. M. (2018). Cross-race correlations in the abilities to match unfamiliar faces. Acta Psychologica, 185, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.006
  • Lander, K., Bruce, V., & Bindemann, M. (2018). Use-inspired basic research on individual differences in face identification: Implications for criminal investigation and security. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0115-6
  • Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M. (2018). Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy. PLoS one, 13, e0193455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193455
  • Bindemann, M., Fysh, M. C., Sage, S. S., Douglas, K., & Tummon, H. M. (2017). Person identification from aerial footage by a remote-controlled drone. Scientific Reports, 7, 13629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14026-3
  • Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2017). Forensic face matching: A review. In M. Bindemann & A. M. Megreya (eds.), Face Processing: Systems, Disorders, and Cultural Differences. New York, NY: Nova.
  • Fysh, M. C., & Bindemann, M. (2017). Effects of time pressure and time passage on face-matching accuracy. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170249
  • Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M. (2017). A visual processing advantage for young-adolescent deaf observers: Evidence from face and object matching tasks. Scientific Reports 7, 41133:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41133
  • Bindemann, M., Fysh, M., Cross, K., & Watts, R. (2016). Matching faces against the clock. i-Perception, 7, 2041669516672219. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2041669516672219
  • Alenezi, H. M., Bindemann, M., Fysh, M. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2015). Face matching in a long task: Enforced rest and desk-switching cannot maintain identification accuracy. PeerJ, 3, e1184. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1184
  • Bindemann, M., Attard, J., & Johnston, R. A. (2014). Perceived ability and actual recognition accuracy for unfamiliar and famous faces. Cogent Psychology, 1, 986903. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2014.986903
  • Alenezi, H. M., & Bindemann, M. (2013). The effect of feedback on face matching accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2968
  • Johnston, R. A., & Bindemann, M. (2013). Introduction to forensic face matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 697-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2963
  • Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M. (2013). Individual differences in personality and face identification. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.739153
  • Bindemann, M., Brown, C., Koyas, T., & Russ, A. (2012). Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001
  • Bindemann, M., Avetisyan, M., & Rakow, T. (2012). Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observers consistency in person identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029635
  • Özbek, M., & Bindemann, M. (2011). Exploring the time course of face matching: Temporal constraints impair unfamiliar face identification under temporally unconstrained viewing. Vision Research, 51, 2145-2155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.009
From person identification to species identification in conservation
  • Austen, G. E., Bindemann, M., Griffiths, R. A., & Roberts, D. L. (2016). Species identification by experts and non-experts: Comparing images from field guides. Scientific Reports, 6, 33634:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33634
  • Gibbon, G. E. M., Bindemann, M., & Roberts, D. L. (2015). Factors affecting the identification of mountain bongo antelope. PeerJ, 3, e1303. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1303
 

Corporate Communications

The University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NZ, T: +44 1227 764000

Last Updated: 18/03/2021