General Information about Student Academic Appeals

General Information about Appeals

This page contains information about different appeal types, an explanation of technical conditions and why they are important, and information about what you are not allowed to request in your appeal.

Information on this page applies to all appeal types.

Appeals against the decision of Boards of Examiners

An appeal against the recommendation of the Board of Examiners is a request for a review of the decision made by the Board of Examiners regarding your progression through the stages of your degree, or your award (degree).

  • Are you studying an undergraduate or postgraduate taught course?
  • Have you received your formal results on KentVision? The formal results are normally released in June/July and early September for resits. See the dates for publication of (examination) results

Appeals against the decision of Academic Misconduct Committees or their Chairs

  • Have you been investigated for breaching academic integrity and received a penalty via formal letter (email)?
  • This type of appeal applies to all students - those studying on undergraduate and postgraduate on taught courses and those studying on postgraduate research courses.

Appeals against the decision to withdraw a student from their studies via the Student Attendance and Engagement Policy

  • Are you a student studying an undergraduate or postgraduate taught course?
  • Have you been withdrawn from your studies because of low attendance and low engagement?

Appeals by postgraduate research students in relation to progression and examination

  • Have you received the formal outcome of one of your progression reviews that you are dissatisfied about (such as probation or submission)?
  • Have you received the formal decision to transfer you to a lower degree or to terminate your studies due to unsatisfactory progress?
  • Have you received a formal letter informing you of the outcome of the examination of your thesis?

Technical Conditions for appeals

Technical conditions are rules that apply to formal stages of the appeal process – Formal Appeal and Appeal Review. The Case Manager assigned to your appeal will use these rules to assess whether your appeal should be accepted for investigation or whether it should be dismissed.

Your appeal must meet all technical conditions listed below. If it doesn’t meet one or more of these conditions, your appeal may be dismissed.

It is very important that you use the correct form to submit your appeal. If you complete the wrong form, we may not have the relevant information to investigate your appeal and it may be dismissed or result in an unsuccessful outcome.

Read more about different appeal types.

You must provide evidence to support your appeal statements. If you don’t submit any evidence or if your evidence does not relate to your appeal, it may be dismissed.

Read more about what evidence should be included in your appeal.

If you submit your appeal late, you will be asked to provide a reason, with supporting evidence, for this. The Case Manager will consider your explanation and if they decide that your reason is not valid, they may dismiss your appeal.

See information about appeal deadlines.

Read more about what could be considered a valid reason for a late appeal.

Appeal grounds are permissible reasons for submitting an appeal. They are limited and clearly defined for each appeal type. You must explain how your appeal fits these grounds. If you don’t explain this clearly in your appeal or if your appeal doesn’t meet any of the grounds, your appeal may be dismissed.

Read more about different appeal types and grounds for appeal.

You must clearly state an outcome that you wish to achieve. You cannot ask for the outcome that is not permitted in the Universities Regulations and, if you do so, your appeal may be dismissed.

This technical condition applies to Formal Appeals only.

You should attempt to resolve any concerns you have with your Division first, by submitting an early resolution request. If you haven’t submitted an early resolution request, you will have to provide a good reason for not doing so.

For some appeal types, outcomes that you can request via early resolution are limited. 

See more information on Early Resolution webpage.

What can you not appeal against?

There are no circumstances that would allow you to appeal against academic judgement.    

Academic judgement is defined as an opinion that can only be given by an academic expert, for example, a judgement about marks awarded for assessment, progression, degree classification or the achievement of course outcomes.

This means that you cannot:

  • Challenge a mark because you think that the marker was wrong.
  • Ask for your work to be remarked.
  • Ask for your degree classification to be raised.
  • Challenge the Academic Misconduct Committee or its Chair's decision that the work you submitted was not your own. 
  • Challenge the Academic Misconduct Committee or its Chair's decision on the extent that your work was not your own. 
  • Appeal against a decision of the examiners on whether your thesis satisfies the requirements for the award (for students on postgraduate research courses. 
  • Appeal against a decision on whether you have met the required standard to continue on your degree course (for students on postgraduate research courses).

What is not considered to be extenuating circumstances?

Are you appealing under grounds of illness and other extenuating circumstances? 

Please note that the following examples are not normally considered as extenuating circumstances:

  • Completing coursework too late. 
  • Missing deadlines because of computer or transport difficulties.
  • Losing work not backed up digitally.
  • Normal employment commitments. 
  • Failing to read an examination timetable or other instructions correctly.

This list is not exhaustive.