Information about Appeal Reviews

Appeal Review

This page provides information about requesting an appeal review if you have received the outcome of your original appeal and it was partially upheld or dismissed.

Please read this page in detail before submitting a request for an appeal review.

We will include the link to the online appeal review request form in the outcome of your formal appeal if it has been partially upheld or dismissed.

If you have received a letter (email) informing you about the outcome of your formal appeal, it will say whether you are able to request an appeal review.

You have to submit your request for an appeal review within 7 calendar days of receiving your appeal outcome letter.  

In an appeal review, the original appeal decision is reviewed by an Academic Chair, and sometimes by an Appeal Review Panel.

An appeal review is not usually a new consideration of the issue itself or a new investigation. Instead it is a review of the decision made at the formal review stage.

Grounds for appeal review

For what reasons can you ask for an appeal review?

Please also ensure that your request meets the Technical Conditions.

Failed to follow Appeal Policy

When you review your case file, and you believe that the appeal case managers did not follow the procedure in the Academic Appeals Policy

For example, if the outcome of the appeal was not one allowed by the policy.

Please remember that you will have to provide evidence that the policy was not followed correctly.

Relevant new evidence

When you have new evidence that could make a difference to the appeal outcome, but which has only become available since you submitted your appeal, and that you could not have received and submitted earlier. 

For example, if you have experienced illness or other mitigating circumstances but you had a good reason why you were not able to apply for mitigation before or submit this evidence with your appeal.

Bias in the decision making

When you have reasonable grounds and can present evidence that the appeal case manager showed bias against you in the way the decision of the formal appeal was made. 

Unreasonable decision

When the decision made by the appeal case manager was not reasonable, that means if the decision was not based on the evidence submitted with the appeal form, and did not consider the outcomes that were possible at the formal appeal stage.

Please remember that you have to provide a clear explanation why the decision was not reasonable.

Who looks at the appeal review request?

Find out more about the different steps of the appeal review process and who is involved in the review.

folder-user

Academic Chair review

An Academic Chair (a senior academic from a Division other than your own) will be reviewing your appeal review request and make a decision about the outcomes.

In reaching one of these outcomes, the chair may also decide to refer the case back to the academic body (e.g. Board of Examiners) that made the original decision. 

The chair may also refer the case back to the formal appeal stage.


The chair may also decide that a review by an Academic Appeal Review Panel is necessary and convene a hearing.    

users

Appeal Review Panel Hearing

The academic chair may decide to convene an Academic Appeal Review Panel Hearing to consider your case.

This is an academic judgement by the chair and not something you can request.

register

Appeal Review Outcome

We will send you the outcome within 28 calendar days of receiving the appeal review request, or within 52 calendar days if a panel hearing is convened.

The possible outcomes of the appeal review are:

  • upheld: that your request meets the ground for appeal and you will receive the outcome you requested
  • partially upheld: that your appeal was partially successful because you have received some but not all of the outcomes you requested, or different outcomes that are beneficial to you
  • dismissed: that you will not receive the outcome you requested 
wall

End of the Internal Appeal Process at Kent

Once you reach the end of the internal appeals process and there is no further route available for you to pursue your case, we will issue you a Completion of Procedures Letter (CoP letter). 

This letter will allow you to take your case to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA). It is an independent body set up to review student complaints about higher education providers in England and Wales.

Appeal Review Submission Guide

Here is an overview of the questions in the request form. You must answer all questions indicated by an asterisk *  

Please ensure that you have read this guidance in full before starting your submission

Please remember that your appeal review request also has to meet the Technical Conditions.  

We will ask you to provide the following information about you as a student.

  • Your surname*
  • Your preferred name (first name)*
  • Your Kent Student ID* - it is an 8-digit number that you can find on the back of your KentOne card. If you don't have a KentOne card, enter 99999999.
  • Your University/Institutional email* - @kent.ac.uk, @student-csbschool.co.uk, @gsk.com, @lamda.ac.uk, @lcds.ac.uk, @nscd.ac.uk, @pearsoncollegelondon.ac.uk, @nationalcircus.org.uk or @rambertschool.org.uk.

We will ask you to provide the following information about you as a student (continued):

  • Your personal email - we strongly advise that you provide your personal email address so that we can contact you if your University/Institution account is due to be closed (if you are a final year student or if you have been withdrawn from your studies). Please be mindful who has access to your personal email address as we will also send a copy of the appeal outcome if you provide one.
  • Whether you are sponsored under the Tier 4/Student Route*
  • What is your School/Institution* - you will have to pick your School/Institution from the dropdown list.
  • What course you are studying*
  • Stage [applicable only to students on taught courses] - which stage you are currently studying.

You will be asked the following questions:

  • Have you submitted a complaint about this matter via the Complaints Procedure for Students?*
    • If you answer YES -  Please provide the date when you submitted your complaint and details of the outcome if available. 
    • If you answer NO - you won't be asked any more details.

See more information about student complaints.

You will be asked the following questions:  

  • Please provide the date of your formal appeal outcome*
  • If you are submitting your appeal review request beyond the deadline, please provide the reasons why. 

Note: If you are submitting your appeal review request within the deadline, you don’t have to answer the question above.

See information about appeal review deadline.

You will be asked the following question: 

  • Provide full details of the university’s conventions and/or the Academic Appeals Policy that you believe the appeal case manager failed to follow*

You will have to attach evidence. Please note that this ground does not relate to new evidence about your formal appeal case.

You will be asked the following question: 

  • Describe the evidence of bias shown towards you by the appeals case manager:* 

You will have to attach evidence. Please note that this ground does not related to new evidence about your formal appeal case.

You will be asked the following questions

  • Provide full details of the new evidence:*
  • Please explain why you weren’t able to provide this information earlier, either to your Division or when submitting the formal appeal?*

You will be asked the following question:

  • Describe why you believe that the appeal case manager made an unreasonable decision /or the outcome was not proportionate in all of the circumstances:*

Please make sure that you carefully consider which evidence was available to the case manager when the decision was made. If you have new evidence now, the case manager would not have been able to include it in the decision-making. 

If you have new evidence, please consider if that would be an appropriate ground for the appeal review request (see above ground: New evidence).

You will be asked the following question about the outcome you want to achieve in your appeal review:

  • What is the outcome you are seeking from this appeal review request?*  

  • At the end of the appeal review request form you will be asked whether you have any evidence to support your appeal. 
  • If you answer 'YES', the Quality Assurance and Compliance Team will be in touch with you within 2-3 working days with instructions on how to submit your evidence.
  • Please note that we will normally email to your University/Institutional account only, so be sure to check your emails regularly, as you will be given the deadline by which you need to submit your evidence.

Read more about appeal evidence.

Academic Appeal Review Panel Hearing

When reviewing the appeal review request, the academic chair may decide to convene an Appeal Review Panel Hearing. This is an academic decision and not something you can request.

The panel hearing will normally take place within 14 calendar days after you are informed that a hearing will be convened.

Hearings take place in person or via video link.

Panel Membership

The panel members normally are:

  • Chair: senior academic from a Division other than your own.
  • Academic Member: a member of academic staff outside of your School/Subject Area. 
  • Student representative: a sabbatical officer or a student member nominated by the Students’ Union.
  • Secretary: appeal case manager. 

Attending the Hearing

You have the right to attend the hearing.

You can be accompanied by a member of staff or a student of the University or a member of staff of the Students' Union or a relative.

If you do not take up the opportunity to attend the hearing, the Chair may decide to either postpone or hold the hearing without you. It is important that you let the secretary know when you receive the invite if you are unable to attend.

Completion of Procedures Letter

A Completion of Procedures letter confirms that you have reached the end of the appeals process within the university.

You can use it if you want to raise your complaint externally with the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA). It is an independent body set up to review student complaints about higher education providers in England and Wales.

A Completion of Procedures letter will be automatically issued if your appeal review request is dismissed.

In all other cases, you can request a Completion of Procedure letter if:

  • Your formal appeal was upheld: within 28 calendar days of receiving your outcome.
  • Your formal appeal was partially upheld or dismissed and you do not have grounds to request an appeal review: within 7 calendar days of receiving your outcome.
  • Your appeal review request was upheld or partially upheld: within 28 calendar days of receiving your appeal review outcome.