School of Economics

2004 Discussion Papers

School of Economics Discussion Paper 04/11
October 2004

Managing Asymmetric Conflict
Paul Dunne, Maria del Carmen Garcia-Alonso, Paul Levine and Ron Smith

School of Economics
University of Kent at Canterbury

Abstract

We consider conflicts between an incumbent, e.g. government or dominant firm, and potential challengers, e.g. guerilla movement or entrants. It is not uncommon for challengers to win such conflicts despite their lack of resources. They can do this by exploiting a second mover advantage: choosing to attack the incumbent in ways that it had not prepared for, because it was locked in by past investments. To model such asymmetric conflict we use a three stage game. In the first stage the incumbent chooses effort; in the second stage the challengers choose the degree of differentiation from the incumbent and in the third stage each decide whether to attack or defend and collect their payoffs. This simple model has a number of interesting predicitions, which may apply in certain types of legal, commercial and military conflicts.

JEL Classification: L10, D74

Keywords: Game theory, product differentiation, conflict

To download the file in PDF format click here

School of Economics, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NP

Undergraduate enquiries: +44 (0) 1227 827497, Postgraduate enquiries: +44 (0) 1227 827440 or email us

Last Updated: 12/03/2015