© University of Kent - Contact | Feedback | Legal | FOI | Cookies
M | T | W | T | F | S | S | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Week | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
View Week | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
View Week | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
View Week | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
View Week | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
- Show all
- 50th anniversary
- Admissions and recruitment
- Alumni and reunions
- Art and exhibitions
- Conferences
- Deadlines
- Equality and Diversity
- Film and television
- Health, wellbeing and fitness
- Lectures, talks and seminars
- Music
- Other
- Religious festivals
- Research
- Short courses and day schools
- Sport
- Staff development
- Student skills and employability
- Student Union
- Term dates and holidays
- Theatre and performance
- University meetings
- Worldfest
- Outreach
- Public engagement
Abstract: The central tenets of anthropogenic global warming - that warming is occurring, that it is human induced and that it is a very serious problem - are uncontroversial among scientists. Yet the general public are divided on the issue. In this lecture, I will argue that both sides of the debate are acting rationally. We cannot settle difficult scientific questions ourselves. Instead, we have to rely on the testimony of people who are better informed than we are. We filter testimony in various ways, looking for signs of competence and trustworthiness. Both sides are filtering testimony appropriately. The rationality of accepting a claim dissociates from its truth.
Location
Lecture Theatre 2,Keynes College,
University of Kent,
Canterbury,
Kent,
CT2 7NP
United Kingdom
Map