|
Back
to Senectus Project Overview
The MDS-HC and the Single Assessment Process
The
guidelines for the Department of Health (DoH) Single
Assessment Process (SAP) specify four levels of
assessment: initial contact assessment, overview
assessment, in-depth assessment, and comprehensive
geriatric assessment. This summary describes how the MDS
HC was developed, and outlines the relationship of the
MDS HC assessments to the SAP assessments (as well as to
the Registered Nursing Contribution to Care (RNCC)).
Development
of the MDS HC
The MDS HC
was developed on a rigorous systematic basis by interRAI,
an international research and development collaboration
(www.interrai.org). It was designed to be used by health
or social care professionals who had been trained in its
use.
In the first stage of development, the domains important
for managing people at home were identified, then panels
of professionals with expertise in these areas designed
the client assessment protocols (CAPs) that give
guidance on best practice for care planning for each
domain. The following CAPs were designed for the MDS HC:
|
·
ADLs/rehabilitation potential
|
·
Instrumental ADLs
|
|
·
Health promotion
|
·
Institutional risk
|
|
·
Communication disorders
|
·
Visual function
|
|
·
Alcohol abuse and hazardous drinking
|
·
Cognition
|
|
·
Behaviour
|
·
Depression and anxiety
|
|
·
Elder abuse
|
·
Social function
|
|
·
Cardio-respiratory
|
·
Dehydration
|
|
·
Falls
|
·
Nutrition
|
|
·
Oral health
|
·
Pain
|
|
·
Pressure ulcers
|
·
Skin and foot conditions
|
|
·
Adherence
|
·
Brittle support system
|
|
·
Medication management
|
·
Palliative care
|
|
·
Preventative health measures,
immunisation and screening
|
In the
second stage, using evidence from research literature,
each CAP was constructed according to a standard
framework. The framework consisted of objectives,
triggers (assessment items that identify the presence or
risk of a problem or potential for improvement),
background information, and care-planning guidelines.
The guidelines are in the form of a check list that,
together with professional input, ensure relevant
information is considered in ensuring best practice for
care planning (see Figure 1 .below).
In the final
stage, the trigger items and other items considered
essential to ensure adequate assessment of a domain were
compiled into the assessment instrument. Detailed
information for completing the assessment and all the
CAP information is included in a manual that accompanies
the assessment instrument. The manual can also be used
for training or reference.
How
the MDS HC supports the SAP
When
performing the assessments as defined in the DoH SAP
consultation papers, different sections of the MDS HC
can be completed. The logical links between these
sections are illustrated in Figure 2 and are described
below. Links between assessment and further action,
including information to support best practice in care
planning, are provided by the CAPs of the MDS HC.
Note: MDS HC
coverage of the domains required by the National Service
Framework (NSF) for Older People and the DoH SAP
consultation papers is shown in Table 1 on page 8.
The MDS
assessment instruments include:
-
Valid,
reliable, comparable items that accurately record a
person's abilities.
-
Free text
areas for assessors to fully record important person-centred
aspects of assessment such as "What do you want
to achieve but cannot at present?" and "What
do you feel would be most helpful to you in order to
make this possible?"
-
Reliable
scales that can be used to inform clinical practice as
well as outcome monitoring and planning for management
and policy purposes (see the attached paper Outcome
Measurement with MDS).
Figure
2: MDS Assessment Logic compared with SAP
Note: At any time
the assessor may go directly to a Comprehensive Old Age
Assessment if professional judgment so indicates.
Contact
assessment
DoH
statement of purpose
Contact
assessment refers to a first contact between an older
person and health and social services, during which
basic personal information is collected, the nature of
the presenting problem is established, and the potential
presence of wider health and social care problems is
explored.
The
evidence base
There is
currently no evidence base for determining which
questions at an initial contact assessment best
determine the presence of wider health and social care
problems beyond a presenting complaint. The questions
for which there is evidence come from the screening
research literature.
The
seven-item self-reliance algorithm in the MDS HC
provides a reasonable set of items to be added to the
discussion of the presenting problem at contact. Of the
people who are identified as self reliant, only a very
small proportion (< 5%) will be in need of basic
support services such as Home Help as predicted by the
MDS Level of Care algorithm (see Outcome Measurement
with MDS).
MDS
HC at contact assessment
During a
contact assessment, the assessor completes the seven
self-reliance items of the MDS HC.
-
If the
person is self-reliant, the presenting problem is
addressed and no further assessments are performed.
-
If the
person is not self-reliant, the assessor continues
with the MDS HC screener (see below).
The
self-reliance algorithm could be completed as a coarse
screening assessment by, for example, a trained
receptionist in a GP practice or by telephone.
Overview
assessment
DoH
statement of purpose
Professionals
carry out an overview assessment if, in their judgement,
the individual's problems are such that a more rounded
assessment should be undertaken. At overview assessment,
all or some of the domains of the single assessment
process, such as "personal care and physical
well-being", "senses", and "mental
health" are explored. The need for an overview
assessment may be immediately apparent, and should be
commenced once basic personal information has been
collected. At other times, a contact assessment may have
been carried out. In some situations, an in-depth
assessment of a specific problem may have been
undertaken first, with the overview assessment providing
subsequent contextual assessment information.
MDS
HC at overview assessment
The 68 item
MDS HC screener covers 18 of the required domains listed
in the NSF for Older People. The 62 item screener
supplement contains a further 14 domains, five of which
are preventive health items, three of which are personal
safety, and one of which is accommodation. The remaining
items are vision and hearing, dressing, oral care, and
foot care (see Table 1 on page 8). interRAI UK
recommends that the screener plus the supplement are
completed for overview assessment, since the DoH
guidance requires that all domains in the NSF are
covered in the overview assessment (Guidance for local
implementation, page 6 section 8).
There is perhaps a case, however, for excluding the
preventive health items if they have been assessed in
the past 6-12 months. The personal safety items may be
considered unnecessary in a large number of people who
are well known to the service that is undertaking the
overview assessment. Accommodation would likely be
covered in the contact assessment as part of the
individual demographic information.
Where the
overview assessment questions trigger an MDS HC CAP,
in-depth assessment of that domain is indicated. Where
several CAPs have been triggered, in-depth assessment is
indicated. This may be at the discretion of the
assessor, or may be subject to local policy agreement
until more research evidence is available.
In-depth
assessment
DoH
statement of purpose
In-depth
assessment offers a way of exploring specific problems
in detail and may be indicated by a contact or overview
assessment. As a result of an in-depth assessment,
professionals should be able to confirm the presence,
extent, cause, and likely development of a health
condition or problem, and establish links to other
conditions and problems.
MDS
HC at in-depth assessment
The in-depth
assessment should include, as a minimum, the MDS HC
screener and screener supplement items. Where a CAP is
triggered in an assessment domain during an overview
assessment, the remaining MDS HC items in that domain
should be completed and the triggered CAPs examined for
further guidance on assessment and care planning.
When CAPs
are triggered in several domains, then the professional
will determine whether a full MDS-HC assessment should
be completed. People who fall into the MI-CHOICE level
of care "Nursing care at home" (see the
attached paper Outcome Measurement with MDS) will likely
require a complex care package. These people and those
in the level of care "Nursing home" or who are
considered likely to need admission to institutional
care should have a comprehensive old age assessment.
Comprehensive
old age assessment
DoH
statement of purpose
Comprehensive
old age assessments should be completed for people where
the level of support and treatment likely to be offered
is intensive or complex, including permanent admission
to a care home, intermediate care services, or intensive
packages of care at home. No decisions on where people
are best supported should be made before all information
from a comprehensive old age assessment information has
been evaluated, including information from medical
assessments and a thorough exploration of rehabilitation
potential.
MDS
HC in Comprehensive Old Age Assessment
The full MDS
HC with all triggered CAPs explored provides a sound
base for a comprehensive old age assessment. Once all
indicated assessments by health and social care
professionals have been completed, the assessments
equate with a comprehensive old age assessment.
Eligibility
criteria for long-term care should reflect assessment
information. These criteria can be checked against MDS
HC assessment items. This process provides objective
assessment information to support decisions based on
eligibility criteria. Professional opinion, based on the
objective assessment data and taking into consideration
the client's and carer's views, will lead to a decision
whether or not to go into a nursing or residential home.
The
Registered Nursing Contribution to Care can be
determined using the RUG algorithm, which can be
completed as a stand alone assessment or derived
directly from a full MDS HC assessment (see the attached
paper Outcome Measurement with MDS).
Admission
to residential long term care
On admission
to a nursing or residential home, the MDS RAI provides a
reliable, valid comparable assessment with the same
structure as the MDS HC and with identical items where
these are common to both instruments. The paper
Assessment in Long Term Care: The National Care
Standards Commission and the MDS RAI provides
information on the MDS RAI measured by the standards
laid down in the Department of Health guidance: Care
Homes for Older People: National Minimum Standards.
SAP
domains
Table 1
below shows how the SAP domains and sub-domains are
covered by MDS HC assessments.
NSF
|
Contact
|
MDS‑HC overview
|
MDS‑HC
|
|
Assessment Area
|
Asessment
|
Screen
|
Suppl.
|
complete
|
|
User’s
perspective
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Problems and issues in the user’s own words
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Self rated health
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
User’s expectations and motivation
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
Clinical
background
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
History of medical problems
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
History of falls
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Medication use
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
Disease
prevention
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
History of blood pressure monitoring
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Nutrition
|
I
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Vaccination history
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Drinking and smoking history
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Exercise pattern
|
S
I
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
• History of cervical and breast screening
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
Personal
care and physical well-being
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Personal hygiene, including washing, bathing,
toileting and grooming
|
S
I
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Dressing
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Pain
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Oral health
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Foot-care
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Tissue viability
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Mobility
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Continence
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Sleeping patterns
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
Senses
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
Sight
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Hearing
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Communication
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
Mental
health
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
Cognition including dementia
|
S
I
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Mental health including depression
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Social contacts, relationships and involvement
|
I
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Caring arrangements
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
Safety
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
Abuse or neglect
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Other aspects of personal safety
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Public safety
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
Immediate
environment and resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
Care of the home
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Accommodation
|
|
|
Ö
|
Ö
|
|
•
Finances
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
|
•
Access to local facilities & services*
|
|
Ö
|
|
Ö
|
* Access to
formal services recorded; access to public services
(e.g., shops, GP surgery) adapted to local requirements.
S = MDS HC
Self-reliance algorithm
I = interRAI predictor of decline
SAP
information requirements All
the information requirements of the SAP guidance can be
aggregated from MDS HC assessments. High quality computer
software to support the MDS assessment instruments is
available from www.aissystems.com.
The MDS HC
has a number of reliable, validated outcome scales for
use with individuals or wider group monitoring
individuals (see the attached paper Outcome Measurement
with MDS).
Copyright
The
intellectual property rights and copyright of the MDS
instruments are owned by interRAI international and
sub-licensed to interRAI UK in the United Kingdom.
Use for care
purposes: A license to use the MDS RAI and the MDS HC
for care purposes in the UK is obtained by purchasing
the relevant instrument manual (cost £50).
Use for
research purposes: The use of interRAI MDS instruments
for research purposes is encouraged. In order to
maintain the integrity of the instruments, research
users must register their research use of the
copyrighted interRAI MDS assessment instruments with
interRAI UK.
Contact
For further
information contact:
Dr Iain Carpenter
Associate Director and Reader in Health Care of Older
People
Centre for Health Service Studies
George Allen Wing
University of Kent
Canterbury CT2 7NF
E-mail: G.I.Carpenter@ukc.ac.uk
Back
to Senectus Project Overview
|