University of Kent > Careers > Applications & Interviews
WHO TO CHOOSE?Typically your first referee will be academic. This would be your course or personal tutor or some other member of staff who knows you well, such as a project supervisor. As well as being able to comment on your academic results and likely degree class, it would be helpful if they knew you well enough to be able to comment on your personal attributes as well. If your tutor isn't available and you can't think of anyone else to use, talk to the departmental office who should be able to suggest someone. All academic staff should have access to your marks. Your second referee would typically be an employer for whom you had worked in the vacation. Alternatively it might be a family friend who has known you for a number of years. Ideally they should be working in some professional position - banker, teacher, doctor etc. Otherwise it might be a teacher with whom you were still in regular contact, or someone who supervised you in some way - church youth group leader, director of a youth orchestra you played for, sports coach for a team you've played for, supervisor of voluntary work etc. References for postgraduate study. Employment references are less important here and you might put more than one academic referee - perhaps a tutor and a project or dissertation supervisor. If you are asked for a third referee, it could be anyone from the above groups - a second employer or academic - preferably someone who will give a different perspective - a project supervisor, or someone who teaches on a different course. The key point is that the referee should know you well enough to be able to write positively about you. They should also know you relatively recently - a teacher that you haven't seen for five years won't be able to say much about your present development. They should of course be someone who sees you in a favourable light. |
Choose your referees carefully ... |
Don't just give their phone number, unless your referee has told you they wish to be contacted in this manner: referees may get annoyed if phoned before they have been contacted by email or letter. It's a good idea to say what their role is (e.g. store manager) or the recruiter may not know if they are the managing director or the cleaner!
NEGATIVE REFERENCESYou would not get a reference like this nowadays due to legal constraints.
ASKING FOR A REFERENCE: HOW NOT TO DO IT!
|
Dr Mike Smith (lecturer in microbiology)
Department of Biosciences
University of Kent
Canterbury
Kent CT2 7NJ
email m.smith9999@kent.ac.uk
Once you have chosen your referees there are certain steps you should take. Make sure that you ask their permission to act as your referee. As well as being polite it makes sure that they're prepared to receive requests for references. It's a good idea to supply your referees with a copy of your CV and other information such as:
The purpose of this is to help your referees to write a more detailed and accurate reference for you. Make sure you take a copy of your answers as it will help you to fill in application forms!
Sometimes it might be after receiving your application, but usually it is after the first interview, or at least after shortlisting candidates for interview. Sometimes it can be after selecting you for the post!
When you get a job or place on a course, make sure that you write to your referees to thank them for their help and to let them know what you are doing. Surprisingly few students seem to bother with this common courtesy. Writing references can be a difficult, long and involved process and you should at least thank them with a letter - who knows you may need to use them again!
You only need to supply references when the organisation you are applying for asks you for them. They could be supplied on a separate page if the job advert required these to be given. Normally applicants put the statement "I am happy to supply references on request" or a similar statement, but it's pretty obvious you will supply references when the time comes, so perhaps even this is redundant.
A reference may take one of several formats:
Well above average |
Above average |
Average |
Below Average |
Well below average |
|||
| Written communication | Succinct clear structured writing which is to the point and conveys its meaning. | Unstructured, verbose or woolly language which is hard to read and misses the point | |||||
| Taking responsibility | Seeks out information and makes decisions on their own initiative. Willing to do what is required to get the task done. Tries to improve themselves. | Unable to carry out work without constant supervision. Reluctant to make decisions. Unwilling to tackle demanding tasks. | |||||
| Organising | Plans ahead and breaks down objectives into manageable tasks with clear goals and deadlines. | Doesn't work well to deadlines. Struggles to amend plans in response to changing priorities. Doesn't allow for contingencies | |||||
| Working under pressure | Can cope with being thrown in the deep end. Can handle several tasks at once. Able to think on their feet. Works well to deadlines. | Struggles to deliver when given several tasks at once. Not good at thinking logically when under pressure. | |||||
| Facing challenges | Focuses on tasks to be achieved and not easily distracted. Shows determination to continue even when things are going wrong. | Shows little resilience and easily deflated when facing obstacles. Easily loses focus. Struggles to stand their ground. | |||||
| Persuading | Deals confidently and diplomatically with people at all levels. Can influence others via reasoned arguments. Can negotiate effectively. | Lacks tact. Struggles to influence others by using logical reasoning. Poor negotiating skills | |||||
Please comment on the student's academic performance over the past two years and their academic ability:
|
|||||||
| Please assess the candidate's abilities in the following areas in comparison with the general undergraduate population: | |||||
| Intellectual Qualities | Creativity | Interpersonal Skills | Motivation | Maturity | |
| Well above average | |||||
| Above Average | |||||
| Average | |||||
| Below Average | |||||
| Well Below Average | |||||
| Please add a statement below commenting on anything else you feel relevant: | |||||
| Please comment on the applicant's qualities below: | Above average | Average | Below average |
| Intellect | |||
| Ability to take in new ideas | |||
| Retentiveness | |||
| How well organised | |||
| How hard working | |||
| How articulate | |||
| Persistence in pursuing and argument | |||
| Ability to accept opposing viewpoints | |||
| Originality of thought | |||
| Popularity with peers | |||
| Participation in university life | |||
| Range of non-academic interests | |||
| Adjustment to university life | |||
| Maturity | |||
| Please make any other comments you feel relevant below: |
Victoria Spice has applied to join our organisation as a graduate trainee and has given your name as a referee. I would therefore be most grateful if you would comment on the following points:
|

References should not normally contain negative information on the applicant, so it would be unlikely that your referee would write anything negative about you, although if they organisation asking for the reference did ask about how much time you had had off, your referee would have to answer this question truthfully.
Overseas students might more commonly be given an open testimonial. This is a type of reference which is given to the student by the referee and can be shown to whoever necessary. Because it can be read by the student, testimonials rarely contain negative information and so are generally considered to be of less value by employers. They reason that any referee who has written something that you will see is going to be less frank than one passing their reference directly to the employer.
Telephone references are becoming increasing common, and are preferred by some employers as they feel that they can get more detailed information than in a written reference.
CIPD advice on writing references www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/recruitmen/selectn/references.htm?IsSrchRes=1
Some thoughts on academic references from the referee’s point of view
www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jan/28/application-university-job-reference
What your referee might really mean (NOT of course to be taken seriously!)
|
|
© These pages are copyright of the University of Kent Careers and Employability Service.
The information and advice given in these pages is primarily for
the benefit of University of Kent students and graduates.
You are most welcome to link to these pages but should not use content in other ways without our permission.
Page maintained by Bruce Woodcock
Please email
me if you wish to make any suggestions which would improve our services.